PALADIN LIMITED (BM)
Holyrood Ltd (subsidiary of Paladin (0495)) v P & T Architects and Engineers Ltd
HK Court of First Instance, 12-Dec-2012
"Madam Oung in other proceedings in Hong Kong also has a history of being able to produce medical reports saying that she was ill when in fact she was jetting around in South-East Asia." - Judge L Chan.
HK Court of First Instance, 12-Dec-2012
"Madam Oung in other proceedings in Hong Kong also has a history of being able to produce medical reports saying that she was ill when in fact she was jetting around in South-East Asia." - Judge L Chan.
Two buyers of "The Oasis", 8-12 Peak Road, v Holyrood, a subsidiary of Paladin (0495)
HK Court of First Instance, 19-Jun-2012
"The defendant knew very well what a substandard building it had delivered to the plaintiffs and to the other purchasers, and yet it was prepared to fight the plaintiffs to judgment through a long and expensive process of litigation". The judge upholds an indemnity costs order.
HK Court of First Instance, 19-Jun-2012
"The defendant knew very well what a substandard building it had delivered to the plaintiffs and to the other purchasers, and yet it was prepared to fight the plaintiffs to judgment through a long and expensive process of litigation". The judge upholds an indemnity costs order.
Two buyers of "The Oasis", 8-12 Peak Road, v Holyrood, a subsidiary of Paladin (0495)
HK Court of First Instance, 1-Mar-2012
Judge Carlson: "the building of these properties has been an absolute disaster...these purchasers were plunged into a nightmare out of which they did not emerge for at least three years...[Lilian Oung] turned what must have been one of Hong Kong's prime building locations into a complete disaster. A real "cowboy" operation."
HK Court of First Instance, 1-Mar-2012
Judge Carlson: "the building of these properties has been an absolute disaster...these purchasers were plunged into a nightmare out of which they did not emerge for at least three years...[Lilian Oung] turned what must have been one of Hong Kong's prime building locations into a complete disaster. A real "cowboy" operation."
3 buyers of Oasis, Peak Road v Holyrood Ltd
HK Court of First Instance, 21-Jun-2011
Holyrood is a subsidiary of Paladin (0495). "The common complaint in each action... is that upon completion... their flats were grossly sub-standard in their construction and finish and that the common parts and the area surrounding the buildings were nothing more than a building site."
HK Court of First Instance, 21-Jun-2011
Holyrood is a subsidiary of Paladin (0495). "The common complaint in each action... is that upon completion... their flats were grossly sub-standard in their construction and finish and that the common parts and the area surrounding the buildings were nothing more than a building site."
Woon Lee (HK) Co Ltd v Holyrood Ltd
HK Court of Appeal, 15-Apr-2011
Holyrood is owned by Paladin (0495).
HK Court of Appeal, 15-Apr-2011
Holyrood is owned by Paladin (0495).
Holyrood Ltd v Woon Lee Construction Co., Ltd.
HK Court of First Instance, 5-Jan-2011
Holyrood is owned by Paladin (0495)
HK Court of First Instance, 5-Jan-2011
Holyrood is owned by Paladin (0495)
Woon Lee Construction Co. Ltd. V Holyrood Ltd
HK Court of First Instance, 26-Oct-2010
Holyrood is owned by Paladin (0495)
HK Court of First Instance, 26-Oct-2010
Holyrood is owned by Paladin (0495)
Woon Lee (HK) Co Ltd v Holyrood Ltd
HK Court of First Instance, 6-Aug-2010
We note that Holyrood is owned by Paladin Ltd (0495). This dispute relates to the Oasis, 8, 10 & 12 Peak Road, and mentions that there are cocklofts installed in several apartments as maids rooms, which the judge suggests are illegal structures.
HK Court of First Instance, 6-Aug-2010
We note that Holyrood is owned by Paladin Ltd (0495). This dispute relates to the Oasis, 8, 10 & 12 Peak Road, and mentions that there are cocklofts installed in several apartments as maids rooms, which the judge suggests are illegal structures.
Paladin terminates open offer because "not all conditions" were satisfied
Company announcement, 9-Jan-2008
This is after the offer closed for applications on 31-Dec-2007. The underwriter is owned by the controlling family. The announcement fails to state which conditions were not satisfied, and fails to disclose the level of acceptances.
Company announcement, 9-Jan-2008
This is after the offer closed for applications on 31-Dec-2007. The underwriter is owned by the controlling family. The announcement fails to state which conditions were not satisfied, and fails to disclose the level of acceptances.
Breach of Listing Rules: missed results deadline due to "pure oversight and forgetfulness"
Company announcement, 5-Apr-2000
Company announcement, 5-Apr-2000
Sign up for our free newsletter
Recommend Webb-site to a friend
Copyright & disclaimer, Privacy policy